Watching female Largemouth bass cruise shallow water flats as they hunt down forage fish is a sight to be seen. These oversized fish work together instinctively like a pack of wolves as they push bait into areas for an easier meal. As I stand back and watch, I'm unsure who's happier - me or the bass.
I'm guessing they put no thought into how good they have it. I get the sense these big beasts assume they live ordinary lives. Who could blame them? Countless hours of good planning, hard work, and good fortune allow biologists to capitalize on these rare opportunities, creating the perfect home for trophy fish. Although many variables play critical roles in the success of these fisheries, water quality is the foundation that makes all of this possible. Without good water quality, these world-class fisheries would fail to reach such an elevated level of success.
Water quality management is not glamorous. For most people, it is confusing, subjective, and misleading. Ignoring water quality or not taking it seriously will eventually result in a poor outcome. If your sights are set on pushing the limits on bass growth, you must find a way to overcome the difficulties related to monitoring, interpreting, and managing water quality. It takes many years of purposeful practice to become a water quality expert.
Time alone does not yield success.
The subject is complicated. Understanding pH is only a measurement that's affected by chemistry and biology. Even many professionals in our field lack a strong knowledge of the subject, ultimately lowering the probability of accomplishing fish growth objectives. I cannot overstate the advantage of partnering with a fisheries biologist who deeply understands water quality.
An experienced water quality expert can simplify the information in a way that inexperienced people can understand. After all, most things related to managing wildlife make sense when properly explained. Proper water quality monitoring is not cheap, but the consequences are costlier. Allocating the right amount of money to monitoring and related improvements can be hard to justify when things get expensive until we genuinely think through the consequences.
With a basic understanding of the mysteries of water chemistry and quality, it can become easier to justify spending the money. It makes it easier to swallow, so to speak.
Let's start by breaking down the confusing, subjective, and misleading attributes.
Labs test a wide variety of water quality parameters; half of them sound similar or rhyme, and most do not apply to your needs. Knowing what to test, what time of year, where to collect the samples, at what depth, and how to interpret the results, and there you have it, confusion begins to set in. For most people, this is where trophy fish management becomes less fun.
Although confusing, testing the water is the simple part. Collect a sample, package it per the lab's instructions, send it in, and wait.
Then, here come the results. Understanding how each parameter positively and negatively affects one another is where many people become confused or lose interest. Understanding which parameters are interconnected and how they impact one another allows a good fisheries manager to logically figure out and explain past and present conditions within the fishery.
A big issue with water quality testing is that the results come back from the lab within desired reference ranges, even though things are out of balance. For example, you have healthy dissolved oxygen (DO) levels, which means you're in good shape right? Nope, that's not how it works. Variables such as time of day, time of year, watershed characteristics, ongoing management strategies, and past and future weather conditions all play a significant role in water quality...not to mention the volume of plant life in the lake. If you collect a water sample in the afternoon, your DO is 9 parts per million (ppm), and your desired range is > 6 ppm, then great, right? Maybe so, maybe not. It may have been only 3 ppm just eight hours earlier. After all, DO increases during the day and decreases at night. So, you have to factor in the time of collection. Once you master the basics of relating your results to the time of day the sample was collected, you can layer in greater foresight. For example, your DO may be great, but your Secchi reading is only 17 inches and you have green water. If you have a week of sunny weather in the forecast, you're likely in good shape, but if you have a week of cloudy weather in the forecast, then it's safe to say that you will be facing low DO soon. With more knowledge comes smarter management decisions.
Another consideration is that surface samples are generally much healthier than samples collected deeper in the water column, and water temperature plays a significant role in how healthy the water is. Collecting samples at cooler times of the year will typically tell you the lake is healthy. Collecting in warmer months will highlight where the fishery has cracks in the foundation, especially if you're testing at the bottom during hot months. Does this mean you should only test when water is warm or hot? No, but if you are only testing water quality once and are trying to learn about DO and phosphorus, then summer provides the most valuable data.
In further understanding why water quality data is subjective and misleading, it is crucial to understand that not all water quality testing is the same. Multiple standardized methods exist to test parameters. This results in different labs using different methods to come up with the same answer.
Each time a lab tests your water for parameters such as phosphorus, they should also run a test on a solution that has a known value. This gives the lab technician confidence that they can trust the results when testing your lake water. If they test the standard and receive a different reading, they start over and retest everything. Even with strict protocols, labs have set tolerance limits, accepting variances as high as 10 percent from the standards when testing in the low detection limits. This acceptable variance among high-quality labs reflects the difficulty of obtaining accurate water quality results for specific parameters.
High-quality, accredited labs complete routine proficiency testing. This is a process where the lab is sent blind samples from an accrediting agency. That lab needs to report accurate results to the agency to maintain its accredited status. When possible, it is best to find a high-quality, accredited lab and then stick with them, as it is more likely that you will receive results that are apples to apples. Analytical labs are the go-to when possible, as they typically have strict standardization and calibration protocols in place.
These high-quality labs are most important when looking at low detection levels in the parts per billion range. Accurate results require testing the water as soon as possible, in many cases no more than 48 hours after collection, and those samples should be chilled and remain cold from the time of collection to the time the lab is ready to test. The sooner you can have the sample tested, the better your odds of receiving good data. A lab that rejects water samples because they do not meet the time or temperature requirements is the type of lab you should work with, as they take water testing seriously.
Once tested, the data needs to be incorporated into your fisheries management plan. This requires strong critical thinking and working knowledge of the fishery. The data should make sense when considering the past and present conditions in the waterbody and fishery. It is vital to minimize assumptions.
A good water quality monitoring program should continuously build its water quality dataset. Each sampling event is a data point, a dot on a map. A good fisheries manager can analyze those data points and formulate sound management decisions to ensure high probabilities of success.
It is important to note that fisheries being managed intensively to produce trophy fish should strive for excellent water quality, not simply good water quality. In some cases, the optimal ranges for parameters are not good enough. To create an exceptional fishery, you should hold your water quality to higher standards than the average waterbody.
Sound data, teamed with proper critical thinking, allows managers to ensure that future management strategies are aligned with the needs of the fishery. As you solve the riddle, you can start making real progress and improve the probability of success. Get the riddle wrong, and you eventually fail one way or another.
Becoming a water quality expert is a by-product of passion for trophy fish management, rather than a reflection of how enjoyable the topic is. If you want the highest probability of producing trophy fish, you have to spend time on this less-than-exciting, complicated subject matter. If becoming an expert is not for you, then hire one. The rewards from your hard work and smart decisions will help build the foundation needed to create some incredible memories.
David Beasley is a Fisheries Biologist and the Director of Fisheries at SOLitude Lake Management, an environmental firm providing sustainable lake, pond, wetland, and fisheries management services. Learn more about this topic at www.solitudelakemanagement.com/knowledge
Reprinted with permission from Pond Boss Magazine
